A-Team_Group_Fidessa-Post-trade ETD_July_2018

The fund management industry’s shift to passive funds and embrace of smart-beta funds over the past decade or so has shaved margins to the extreme. In this environment, operational efficiency becomes an existential issue.

Across a broad swathe of asset classes, front-office technologies have kept pace with massive changes in market structure driven by regulation and innovation. But post-trade business processes continue to play catch-up.

Nowhere is this more true than in exchange-traded derivatives, where few technology options are available to aid buy-side firms as they face a myriad of challenges as they strive to ensure efficiency, accuracy and regulatory compliance.

The use of multiple clearing brokers is fragmenting buy-side operational processes. The continued T+1 availability of clearing data is introducing delays in delivering final trade and position confirmations to clients. The reliance by brokers on files for data delivery is blocking development of a more efficient messaging standard.

And there’s more.

The buy-side’s reliance on manually processed broker-provided clearing data makes fund managers’ work flows prone to errors. Commission management is typically handled outside of the post-trade process, requiring fund managers to re-integrate this information after the event for fund administration and client reporting. And the increasing complexity of the execution landscape – with funds trending towards more block trades – is making it difficult to calculate a true price.

All of these issues are conspiring to disrupt work flows and introduce operational risk and costs into the post-trade process.

Market practitioners, however, are working to address inefficiencies in post trade. For a discussion of the challenges currently facing players in the ETD space and industry initiatives designed to address them, please download this free paper by clicking here.

   
Back to datamanagementreview.com

Download now!